One
book that is sure to find a wide audience among
active tournament players is Grandmaster Dorian
Rogozenko’s ANTI-SICILIANS: A GUIDE FOR
BLACK. This excellent first effort by the Moldovan
GM builds on an earlier pioneering work by
Grandmaster Joseph Gallagher in covering all
non-main line (d4) systems by White in the
Sicilian. This means not only answers to the
popular Rossolimo and Alapin (2.c3) variations
but also sidelines like 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.b3
and 2.g3.
Rogozenko is very thorough and
his love of theory shines through. The coverage
in this book is extensive enough that GMs and
IMs could use it with profit. Rogozenko goes
his own way. Where else would you see a GM announce
in print that White has enough for the pawn in
the Smith Morra Gambit accepted? Readers might
initially think that Rogozenko was just being
practical, that by declining the Smith Morra
with …Nf6 Black was killing two birds with
one stone (using …Nf6 versus both the Smith
Morra and the Alapin), but that is not the case.
Rogozenko is a perfectionist that
believes in playing the best move in the position
even if it means learning more lines than are
absolutely necessary. For example, he proposes
after 1.e4 c5 2.d3 to play a setup based on …g6, …d6,
and …e5, while after 2.g3 he recommends
2…d5 while acknowledging that Black would
very likely transpose into 2.d3 lines with …g6, …d6,
and …e5.
Rogozenko writes after 2…d5: “This
is the most principled move, by which Black seeks
to exploit White’s temporary vulnerability
on the long diagonal. I consider such an approach
(to exploit the drawbacks of the opponent’s
moves) to be an excellent general policy. One
should know the possibilities that exist in a
certain position and have the pleasure of choosing
for more options. The reader may instead simply
prefer to deal with 2.g3 by means of the same
plan as in Line D, and this would be an understandable
practical decision (reducing two variations to
one). However, it is wiser first to acquaint
yourself with the present line and only then
to make up your mind.
“As explained in the introduction
of Chapter 4, the easiest way is not always the
best one. For me it would be easier to say that
in the diagram position Black should play 2…g6
or 2…Nc6 and reach the same positions as
in the previous line. However, that means ignoring
the strongest move in the diagram position, which
is based on strategic principles (such as developing
pieces in the most active and quick way). By
learning the best moves in a certain position,
the reader will improve his general positional
understanding of chess, and this reason alone
is enough to justify having a look at good alternatives
when learning an opening variation.”
Another example of Rogozenko’s
desire to extract the maximum is his advocacy
of 3…g6 against the Rossolimo. He could
have proposed 3…e6, which would have fit
in better transpositionally – for example:
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 e6 4.Bb5. Another variation
where Rogozenko offers multiple variations is
against the Alapin System where he proposes both
the main lines after 2…Nf6 and also variations
based on early …Nf6 and …e6. His
coverage is excellent but the reader may not
grasp so easily that he can actually employ the
latter line against almost all White’s
tries after 2.c3.
ANTI-SICILIANS: A GUIDE FOR
BLACK is a first rate book which should find
a wide audience among players of Master level
and beyond. Ambitious readers below that level
will also be able to get a lot out of this
work.
YOU
CAN FIND THIS BOOK AT

|