Players
looking to change their opening repertoire are
faced with a daunting task of having to learn
a great deal of opening theory. It's no wonder
that many nonprofessional players simply play
the same openings their entire career. Truly,
the task of learning an opening, like the Najdorf
Sicilian from scratch, is a challenging one. Of
course, you can always learn a sideline that doesn't
require so much knowledge of theory, for example,
the O'Kelly variation of the Sicilian (1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 a6), but then you run the risk of having
no real opening after the surprise value is gone.
GM Yermolinsky in his book The
Road to Chess Improvement,
cautions the student about adopting sideline openings,
pointing out that this band-aid approach will
cripple your chess. His advice is stick to the
main lines. But is there no middle ground?
The
Scandinavian Defense: The Dynamic 3...Qd6
seeks to address this problem. The author, Correspondence
Master Michael Melts, covers a lesser-known sideline
in the Scandinavian, or Center-Counter Defense.
The opening 1.e4 d5 has a lot of practicality.
White really has no good move except to capture
on d5. When Black takes on d5 with the Queen,
White really has nothing much better that 3.Nc3.
Here, Melts advocates 3...Qd6. This line was originally
introduced to the chess world by the Polish IM
Krzystof in an article in the Chess
Player in 1977. Interestingly,
it was his wife Bozena who played most of the
games with it.
The Scandinavian was championed
by Australian GM Ian Rogers in the 1980s and 90s,
but he, and other strong players, played 3...Qa5
exclusively. I've known for a long time that 3...Qd6
was a line, but I never realized until recently
that strong players were taking an active interest
in it. When Chess
Informant 81 appeared
earlier this year, I noticed that Israeli GMs
Kantsler and Gofshtein both had games with this
line. Now I have Melts' book in my hands and I
realize that a lot of games are being played with
3...Qd6!
It's clear that 3...Qd6 is a very
self-directing line, but is it any good? It's
much too early to tell. The most critical test,
Kasparov - Rogers Batumi 2001, saw the Australian
GM essay the line against the former World Champion
in the Europe-Asia Rapidplay. After 1e4 d5 2.exd5
Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 4.d4 Nf6 5.Bd3 Bg4 6.f3 Bh5 7.Nge2
a6 8.Bf4 Qd7 9.d5! White had a nice advantage.
Rogers, in his notes to the game, in a post script
at the end of the book, points out that the main
line offered by Melts, 7...c6, is more solid.
Melts has done an outstanding job
of gathering together all the available material
on this opening. Looking through the examples
he presents, one is struck by the number of 3...Qa5
Scandinavian players who have switched over to
3...Qd6. Whether this is due to the dissatisfaction
with 3...Qa5, a desire to try something new or
simply an attempt to avoid their opponents opening
preparation is difficult to say.
The
Scandinavian Defense: The Dynamic 3...Qd6
should appeal to experienced practitioners of
1.e4 d5 and stronger players looking for something
new against 1.e4. There is a lot of explanatory
prose, especially comparing 3...Qd6 with 3...Qd8/a5,
but players below 2000 may find the material too
dense.
YOU
CAN FIND THIS BOOK AT

|