Pirc
Alert is book that I
haven't finished examining (so much material),
but it seems to be much better as an instructional
work than as a theoretical one. The core of the
book is Chernin's. He is responsible for all of
the "Games and Ideas" section, covering
approximately 180 pages. And the "Theoretical
Variations" section, about 225 pages, is
stated as being "by Alex Chernin, assisted
by Lev Alburt." It is important to note (and
never mentioned, I believe) that this is a repertoire
book for Black, not a comprehensive treatment
of the Pirc. There is only one line offered for
Black against each of White's options, with the
unusual exception that three choices are given
in answer to the relatively rare g3 line. Thus
one plays 5...c5 against the Austrian Attack (3.Nc3,
4.f4, 5.Nf3), for example, and not 5...0-0; similarly,
your move against the Classical (3.Nc3, 4.Nf3,
5.Be2, etc.) is 6...Bg4.
As a bonus, related Modern Defence
positions (1...g6 without ...Nf6) are given throughout
the "Ideas" section, but only sporadically
analyzed, and usually not included in the variations
table at the back of the book. Such 1...g6 lines
offer a way to get to desired positions or avoid
unwanted variations. Nevertheless, actual concrete
analysis is given for just a few Modern lines
involving 4.Bg5 and 4.Be3; and oddly enough, after
a long chapter on the Pirc with 4.Be3, the authors
offer Black two other unique Modern Defense solutions!
I went back to my old review
of Nunn and NcNab's The
Ultimate Pirc to check
on the Classical line that I analyzed there. Alburt
and Chernin repeat that book's mistake of assuming
that a Kasparov blitz game versus a lesser opponent
represents best play in what is arguably the main
line of the whole opening! One assumes that the
game wasn't even looked at, because White seems
to be clearly better at the point where they stop
(it is assessed as equal). Regardless of the assessment,
the authors should have checked this critical
variation (or at least read my review! Just kidding).
See Pirc expert Randy Bauer's lengthy discussion
of missing systems and problems with analysis
on his book review page (see "links").
One of Randy's main points is that Alburt and
Chernin don't seem to have looked at other sources
much, especially Nunn and McNab. Despite some
very fine original analysis by Chernin, the analytical
section is generally disappointing, especially
given Chernin's expertise not only in this opening
but in opening theory generally.
Okay, that's the bad news. But
for some players the good news may by itself outweigh
everything else. I find the ideas and themes section
of the book incredibly instructive and well thought
out. Instead of a mere presentation of a few diagrams
with short thematic comments (such as I myself
gave in my Benoni book, for example), Chernin
treats every main Pirc idea thoroughly and enthusiastically.
He uses many diagrams of typical positions and
then verbally analyses the actual continuations
at length in terms comprehensible to any post-beginner.
The number and variety of these well-chosen examples
over the 180 pages is more than impressive. Talk
about "ideas behind the chess openings"--by
comparison, one has to laugh at superficial and
misleading attempts such as Fine's, even for his
time. This is truly quality stuff from a knowledgeable
grandmaster.
In conclusion, I think that
for mid-level readers, especially those beginning
or wanting a user-friendly tutorial on the Pirc,
the complete and detailed treatment of variations
given by Nunn & McNab will probably not be
as important as the extraordinary instructiveness
of Pirc Alert.
The superb "Themes and Ideas" section
could be a book in itself; it is easily the best
example I've seen of this idea-based approach.
Just be warned that the analytical section is
choppy, has holes, and will probably not satisfy
an experienced Pirc player.
YOU
CAN FIND THIS BOOK AT

|