There
are several less explored variations of the Dutch
that can serve some players well, and this book
does a decent job of presenting their basic ideas
and analysis. Unfortunately, the price to page
ratio is relatively high, and the author fails
to cover some viable white alternatives, which
makes what could be a practically great book into
one that is practical and pretty good.
The Classical Dutch is characterized by the black
formation with …f5…e6…Nf6. Based
on white’s play, black can choose to play
…Bb4(+) or develop the bishop on e7. Unlike
the Stonewall, where black also plays …c6
and …d5, here black is more likely to play
…d6 and work for the break with …e5.
Generally, if black can achieve this and prevent
white from effectively playing e2-e4, he can get
a reasonable game.
One of the advantages of this form of Dutch is
that it is not played nearly as often as the Stonewall
or Leningrad (characterized by black’s fianchetto
of the dark squared bishop) variations. As a result,
the black player specializing in this variation
has much less theory to learn and can expect that
his opponent is not nearly as prepared for this
as other Dutch variations. The variation also
has some pretty common themes for both players;
this makes it a relatively easy variation to learn
from scratch.
The author is a young aggressive player who specializes
in this as black. His understanding of the key
ideas is evident, and he provides a useful introduction
that presents illustrative games, the basic strategic
ideas for both players, and issues relating to
move order. These 10 pages provide a solid foundation
for a player wishing to learn the key aspects
of the variation.
Part one of the book analyzes the Ilyin-Zhenevsky
System, which arises after 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nf3
Nf6 4.g3 Be7 5.Bg2 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3. Black now
has three major choices – 7…a5 (complex
and flexible), 7…Qe8 (most common but perhaps
too committal) and 7…Ne4! (the author’s
punctuation and not nearly as well known to theory
as the previous choices). The author deserves
credit for analyzing all three of these playable
choices – black players may find that one
or the other best suits their needs in general
or in a specific situation. At the same time,
the author provides some useful guidance on 7…Ne4,
noting that it has been little played but offers
a relatively easy-to-learn method for black in
this variation. The author also provides another
chapter that covers ways that white may choose
to avoid this main line after 1.d4 f5 2.g3 Nf6
3.Bg2 e6 with 4.Nd2, 4.Nf3 or other lines after
4.c4 (such as 4…Be7 5.Nh3). This basically
makes up about half the book, and I would consider
it the strongest part.
If nothing else, this book provides several main
line choices for black. The next 25 pages offer
yet another couple of ways for black to play the
main lines after 1. d4 f5 2. c4 e6 3. g3 Nf6 4.
Bg2. First, the author explores set-ups where
black throws in …Bb4+. As the author rightly
notes, if white delays c2-c4 until after he has
castled, these lines cannot be reached for black.
The author analyzes these lines in chapters based
on whether or not white fianchettos his king’s
bishop. As a long-time Dutch player, these lines
are not exactly cutting edge when it comes to
white playing for an edge against the defense.
The author also analyzes a variation attributed
to Alekhine, 1.d4 f5 2.c4 f6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 Be7
5.Bg2 0-0 6.0-0 Ne4!? This retains lots of options
for black’s pawn placement, including transpositions
to the Stonewall (characterized by …d5 and
…c6) if the position warrants it. This could
fit into a repertoire with the …Bb4 variations
– black choosing the Alekhine method if
the move order makes …Bb4+ impractical.
These “main line” approaches comprise
about 2/3rds of the book, and it is its strength,
with the author providing several useful methods
for Black. Unfortunately, there are other ways
for black to play after 1.d4 f5. As a player of
both sides of this defense, I think the general
opinion has become that white’s second move
alternatives, particularly 2.Nc3 and 2.Bg5 are
the most dangerous tests. This is not surprising,
considering that 1…f5 weakens the kingside
and does not immediately contribute to development.
I recall that when reviewing Aagard’s book
on the Stonewall Dutch, only about 25% of the
illustrative games started 1 d4 f5 – the
rest were 1 d4 e6 or other methods meant to avoid
these dangerous second move alternatives.
There are several of these dangerous alternatives
that do not even warrant a mention by the author.
For something basic, try to find 1.d4 f5 2.h3.
While you might think this pretty esoteric, Korchnoi
has lent his name to the variation, and there
has been a fair amount of coverage (white plays
a quick g2-g4) devoted to it in other Dutch books.
As one who has lost against this variation, I
can attest to the fact that it deserves attention.
IM Angus Dunnington, in his recent book ATTACKING
WITH 1.d4 (click to see Donaldson’s
and Watson’s
reviews of this book), also suggested a repertoire
based on 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e6 4.f3!?. Again,
this gets no mention here.
I don’t mean to use these examples as a
sort of chess “gotcha” exercise. At
the same time, this is a pretty light book repertoire-wise,
and some of this stuff deserved coverage. Make
no mistake, this is not a book based around extensive
theoretical coverage, and while that in and of
itself is not bad, one should not overlook playable
alternatives either, particularly when they are
the subject of discussion in recent books on the
same opening variation.
In conclusion, the Classical Dutch is an underrated
system within the Dutch Defense. If you already
play the Dutch as black and are comfortable with
the non-main line systems (or if you use the 1.d4
e6 move order and are willing to play something
else after 2.e4), this is an excellent book with
several useful choices for black. However, if
you are just getting started with this defense
and have few other resources, you might run into
some painful learning experiences.
Click HERE
to see Donaldson’s review of this book.
YOU
CAN FIND THIS BOOK AT

|