| Nobody
writes better repertoire books than John Watson
does, and the latest reprise of his French repertoire
only adds to his reputation. Using meticulous
research coupled with thorough explanation and
original analysis, the author develops a mainstream
repertoire that should stand up to the most serious
scrutiny. In my opinion, there is no single author
who has written as many great books as Watson
in the last ten years. PLAY THE FRENCH NEW
EDITION (1996), THE UNCONVENTIONAL KING'S
INDIAN (1997), SECRETS OF MODERN CHESS STRATEGY
(1998 - click to see Silman's review),
THE GAMBIT GUIDE TO THE MODERN BENONI (2001 - click
to see Silman's
review), and CHESS
STRATEGY IN ACTION (2003 - click to see reviews
by Bauer and Donaldson)
were all excellent books. I believe Watson's
CHESS STRATEGY IN ACTION is the best
book of the year 2003. His latest book
is a worthy successor to those previous
efforts. As with his two previous French books, Watson
creates a repertoire to cover all plausible
White attempts after 1.e4 e6. In fact, Watson
covers so many lines that receive little
treatment in other places (often quite early
deviations) that this book may prove useful
to French players even if they do not follow
Watson's specific repertoire. This thoroughness
is typical of Watson's work - he doesn't
simply parrot the same "book lines" inherited
from other books. Another notable feature of the repertoire
is its variety. Against most main lines,
Watson provides at least two methods for
black. This is the preferred approach for
repertoire books, as it gives the reader
an opportunity to choose lines that better
fit his or her style of play. Further, if
one of the lines should be found wanting,
the book could still retain more of its theoretical
value. Watson's main lines are generally
mainstream, so it's not likely that too many
big holes will be punched in them, but the
book also contains a vast store of suggestions
(even some for white) that should allow the
reader ample opportunity for further analysis
and original play. Recently, another French expert, Lev Psakhis,
wrote a couple of books on the French as
well. Because both were released about the
same time as Watson's book, there was no
opportunity for either author to consult
the other's work. As a consequence, I compared
the sections on the Advance variation in
both books to get some insight into who had
done a more thorough job on the lines in
question. Unlike Watson, the Psakhis books
(ADVANCE AND OTHER ANTI-FRENCH VARIATIONS
and FRENCH DEFENSE 3 Nd2) are complete coverage
books. While Watson uses the standard analytical
tree method, Psakhis presents his analysis
via complete games. I generally prefer
the tree method for the sake of clarity,
and this is one of the key problems with
Psakhis' books, especially the one on the
Advance and other anti-French variations,
which I found riddled with missing lines,
confusing sub-structure and an overall lack
of cohesion. There is no editor or proofreader
listed, which isn't surprising since it seems
that there was little editing or proofing
done. In general, Watson's work was more thorough.
There were numerous places where Watson either
improves on existing theory or has done a
more exhaustive look than Psakhis. There
is also no comparison whatsoever in terms
of organization of material, commentary,
and production. One of the interesting aspects of Watson's
French books is that the repertoire has changed
over time. For example, in the first edition
the secondary line for the Winawer after
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 was 4.Qd7.
However, there were some serious holes punched
into black's lines, and Watson switched to
4.c5 5.a3 Bxc3 6.bxc3 Qc7 in the second edition.
In this edition, Watson has made a major
change in coverage: the main line Winawer
after 6.Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 has been replaced by
the newer 7.0-0. Likewise, the high-class
waiting move 3.Be7 has replaced the main
line of the Tarrasch, 3.Nd2 Nf6. In Watson's opinion, the theory around both
of these variations has gotten too broad
and deep to manage, and you can't help but
give him the benefit of the doubt. In fact,
most players seek the comfort of a repertoire
book because they do not have the time or
inclination to wade through the deep thicket
of mainstream opening theory. Watson's choices
should benefit those players (although the
theory around 7.0-0 is plenty deep as well). On
the other hand, there likely will be players
of the lines recommended in the previous
edition who will be disappointed by the switch.
On the whole, though, these new choices make
sense for the vast majority of players. It's also notable that, for the first time,
Watson includes coverage of the Classical
Variation (3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 and 4.Bg5 dxe4
5.Nxe4 Be7). This provides the black player
additional choices against both 3.Nc3 and
3.Nd2, since the variation can also be reached
with 3.dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nf6 5.Bg5 Be7. These changes also highlight Watson's serious
approach to revising his previous editions. While
many authors make only minor changes (usually
obvious corrections) to previous editions,
this is closer to a brand new book than a
revision. Besides the fact that this book
is 50 pages bigger and the page size larger,
the commentary is generally refreshed, and,
given the hot status of French theory, the
lines are substantially revised. There are
lots of new interesting ideas not found in
the second edition. There are also places where Watson's ideas
from the second edition have been found wanting.
While Watson is a serious French theoretician
and player (and much stronger than I on both
counts), his analysis should still be subjected
to scrutiny. One line from the last book
that has definitely been found wanting is
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Qb6
6.a3 Nh6!? 7.b4 cxd4 8.Bxh6 gxh6 9.cxd4 Rg8
10.Nc3! Rg4?, which, as the author admits, "looks
bad for several reasons, one of them being
11.h3 Rf4 12.Bb5 a5 13.0-0! axb4 14.axb4
Rxa1 15.Qxa1 Rxf3 16.gxf3 Qxd4 17.Qa8 with
a clear advantage for white." To the author's
credit, he readily admits the error and provides
the evidence - many authors would simply
switch to a different line and never admit
they were wrong in the first place. The depth of coverage found here is a welcome
new direction for Everyman Chess. In most
cases, their opening books have either been
the "Starting Out" series, which provides
less thorough coverage and analysis and concentrates
on explaining key concepts, or coverage of
a single variation in a popular opening or
the entirety of a less popular opening - in
somewhere between 125 and 200 pages. Both
of these formats suffer coverage-wise. That
is definitely not the case here. Of course, depth brings its own set of challenges.
Many players will find the analysis beyond
the scope of their chess understanding, and
some will view a repertoire book stretching
to nearly 300 pages too taxing on their available
time (or spare brain cells). I would guess
that the book would appeal best to experienced
French players or those with an ELO rating
of 1800 and up. In general, the book's production values
are very strong. The paper, printing, and
diagrams are all good, and the book opens
and lays flat with a little bit of help.
I haven't found any typos of note, and the
organization is good. I would note one area
where Gambit books are a bit easier to work
with - when the analysis breaks off into
two or more major subvariations, Gambit notes
the page where the analysis begins. This
is enormously helpful in allowing the player
to navigate between variations. Often a player
is only interested in one of the choices,
and he or she can quickly flip to the appropriate
page rather than having to skim through several
pages of analysis of other lines. In conclusion, John Watson's latest French
repertoire book is a worthy successor to
its two excellent predecessors. As before,
he has combined thorough research with cogent
explanation and a great deal of original
analysis. While some of his recommendations
may have changed, his updated and new coverage
sets the standard for books on this defense. Click to see Silman's review or Donaldson's
review of this book. |