Part
1 | Part 2
With
an excellent game. White already has two pawns
for the exchange and the pawn on d6 cramps Black
considerably. The presence of opposite-colored
Bishops also favors Shabalov, and the dark-squared
weaknesses around Fang's King give particular cause
for concern. Any queenside attack is easily parried
by b2-b3. Black's not lost, but over the board
this is a horrible position to defend.
17...Rab8
18.Be5 Qa4 19.Kb1
b2
is safely covered so there's no rush.
19...Rb5
20.b3 Qb4 21.Rd1 a5 22.Bb2 a4
One
cannot fault Fang for trying.
23.a3
Qh4 24.b4 Qxh2 25.Nxc6!
Another
brilliant tactical shot. Black has no immediate
counterplay and this gives White a chance to conclude
the game.
25...Bxc6
26.Qe7! Rd5
26...Kg8
27.Qf6.
27.Rxd5
Qg1+ 28.Bc1 Bxd5 29.Qxf8 Qf1 30.d7 Qc4, 1-0. From
12 e5 onwards, Fang felt the pressure. A game
that illustrates our theme of the central break
very well indeed.
I knew Emory Tate
well when he came to the UK some years back. We
played a lot of blitz together and I became very
friendly with him. I came to admire his brash,
tactical style. He's used the Vitolins idea a lot
over the years; I think it suits his manner well.
E Tate (2380) - R
Sax [B70]
Illinois, 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Bg5 Bg7 7.Bb5+ Bd7 8.Qe2
0-0 9.0-0-0 Nc6 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.e5

NOT WHAT A DRAGON PLAYER WANTS TO SEE
BANG! To a Dragon
player unfamiliar with the ideas of this system,
a move such as this wins hands down psychologically.
11...dxe5
There's really nothing
else.
12.Nxc6 Qc7
12...Qe8 13.Nxe5 Be6
14.Rhe1! Rc8 (14...Qb8 15.Nc6 Qxh2 16.Nxe7+ Kh8
17.Nxg6+! fxg6 18.Qxe6 Qxg2 19.Be3 and 14...Qc8
15.Qe3 Re8 16.f4 Rb8 17.Qf3 Qc5 18.Qc6 Qb4 19.Nd3
Qa5 20.Rxe6! Rb6 21.Rxf6 Rxc6 22.Rxc6, Ulybin-Rishkov
Kazan 1983, both lead to obvious advantages for
White) 15.Qa6 Rc7 16.Nb5 Rc5 17.Nd4 Bd5 18.Nb3
Bxb3 19.axb3 Qb8 20.Bxf6 Bxf6 21.Nd7 Qxb3 22.Nxf6+
exf6 23.Re2 Rfc8 24.Qxc8+ Rxc8 25.Rd8+ Rxd8 (25...Kg7
26.Rxc8 Qb7 27.Rd8 Qxg2 28.Rd1 Qxh2 29.c4 idea
Rc2 is just good for White) 26.cxb3 Kf8

WHITE STANDS BETTER
So far a forcing sequence
from Vitolins-Mortensen Riga 1981. Now 27.Kc2 is
best, when White's queenside majority and the active
King give him the better chances.
13.Nxe7+ Kh8 14.Bxf6
Bxf6 15.Ned5 Bg5+ 16.Kb1
Stronger is 16.f4!

A POWERFUL SHOT
after which Black
is in very serious trouble: 16...Bxf4+ 17.Nxf4
exf4 18.Qe7 Rfd8 19.Nd5 Qb7 20.Qf6+ Kg8 21.Ne7+,
1-0, Geldyev-Atabaev, Ashgabat 2000, for if 21...Kf8
22.Rde1 is a killer.]
16...Qb8 17.h4
Bh6 18.h5

JUST WINNING
The attack runs on
oiled wheels.
18...Kg7 19.hxg6
hxg6 20.Qf3 Bg5
20...f6 gives White
the opportunity to turn the game into a brilliancy
prize, something I personally wouldn't recommend:
21.Nxf6 Bf5 22.Ncd5 Qc8 23.Qe2 Qe6 24.g4 Rxf6 25.Nxf6
Qxf6 26.gxf5.
21.Ne4 Qd8 22.Ndf6
Bxf6 23.Nxf6 Qxf6 24.Rh7+, 1-0. What a terrible
wipeout! Sax could only dream of the queenside
at his mercy.
To conclude, a very
recent game from the British Championships where
even the ingenious Simon Williams could not shake
off White's immediate central pressure.
Singh (2290) - Williams
(2380) [B70]
Edinburgh, 2003
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nf6 4.Nc3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 g6 6.Bg5 Bg7 7.Bb5+ Bd7 8.Qe2
0-0 9.0-0-0 h6

GOOD OR BAD?
Either this gives
Black extra options or it's simply weakening. As
the game goes I prefer the latter judgment.
10.Bh4 Nc6 11.Bxc6
bxc6 12.e5 dxe5 13.Nxc6 Qe8 14.Nxe5 g5

CENTRAL PLAY vs. BISHOPS
This was the difference.
White has good central play and Black the Two Bishops - which
is more relevant?
15.Bg3 Bf5 16.Rhe1

CALMLY BUILDING
The classical build-up.
16...Rc8 17.Qa6
I think the main reason
I prefer White here is a very basic one: his Rooks
are connected!
17...e6 18.Re2
Nh5
Williams typically
tries to slug his way out. Normal moves are useless - at
some stage White would have taken on a7!
19.Nd7 Nxg3 20.hxg3
Kh7 21.Ne4!
Singh is quite equal
to the tactical challenge. Basically 21.Ne4 refutes
Black's idea. The threat of Nf6+ forces Black to
surrender the Bishop pair, his only trump, and
then White flicks in the capture on f8.
21...Bxe4 22.Nxf8+
Qxf8 23.Rxe4 Rb8 24.c3 Qc5 25.Qd6 Qc8 26.Rb4
Ra8 27.Kb1 a5 28.Rb6
After this queenside
shutdown, the game limps to a close:
28...a4 29.a3 Kg8
30.Qc6 Qf8 31.Rb7 Rc8 32.Rc7 Rb8 33.Qxa4 Be5
34.Rc4 Qg7 35.Ka2 Qf6 36.f4, 1-0. According
to the theory manuals 6.Bg5 and 7.Bb5+ isn't
theoretically dangerous, but for me this is hardly
the point. The ideas are easy to understand and
carry out. White develops and hits quickly in
the center. Black's main lines, all his time
spent burning the midnight oil is laid to waste.
Instead he has to engage in an early fight for
survival! Beneath the very top level, this has
to be an idea which will score point after point
after point.
Part
1 | Part 2
|