<-
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
->
San Diego wasn't the best place
for an aspiring chess professional to live, so
at 19 years of age I packed up my bags and headed
for San Francisco. There the competition was
far stronger.
In my very first SF tournament
I proved successful, finding myself in a tie
for first with one round to go. At that point
an odd thing happened, the other three players
tied with me all began to demand the young Silman
as their final opponent! As luck would have it,
the U.S. Champion got me, blatantly told his
friends that I would be easy-pickings, and the
battle began.
Silman-J Grefe
San Francisco 1974
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3
d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 (Grefe
was a fine theoretician at that time, having
blown away Walter Browne's Najdorf in the U.S.
Championship. Undaunted, I wanted to test my
own preparations against this guy and see if
I was living in a fool's dream. Looking back,
I realize that I really didn't know what I was
doing, but sometimes ignorance really is bliss!) 6.Bg5 (I
felt it would be cowardly to choose anything
but the sharpest line.) 6...e6
7.f4 Be7 8.Qf3 Qc7 9.0-0-0 Nbd7 10.Bd3 h6 11.Qh3 (The
theory on this move, which is still considered
best, was in its infancy at that time.) 11...Rg8 (After
years of trail and error, it was finally ascertained
that 11...Nb6 was Black's best reply. Whether
Black can equalize after 11...Nb6 is quite another
matter.) 12.Bxf6 (Far
more threatening to Black is 12.e5!, with good
chances for a White advantage. Again, none of
this was known in 1974!) 12...Nxf6 (12...Bxf6!?) 13.Nf3
e5 14.f5 Bd7 15.g4 b5 16.Qg2! (A
good move that prepares the thematic g4-g5 advance
[with or without h2-h4] and also creates certain
tactical possibilities along the h1-a8 diagonal.) 16...Qb7
17.g5! b4 18.Nd5 Nxd5 19.exd5 hxg5 20.Be4! (As
my hero Alekhine loved to say, "The point." With
c2 well guarded and the pawns on d5 and f5 solid,
I'm ready to chop on g5 or, in some lines, open
things up further by h2-h4. A little tactic is
also lurking.) 20...Rc8
21.Nxe5 dxe5 22.d6 Qb6 23.dxe7 Kxe7 24.Qxg5+
f6 25.Qg3 Bc6 26.Bxc6 Qxc6 27.Qb3 Qc4 28.Rhg1!
Qxb3 29.axb3 Rcd8 30.Rxd8 Kxd8 31.Kd2 Ke7 32.Ke3
Kf7 33.Rd1 Ke7 34.Rg1, 1/2-1/2.
I felt that I had certainly missed something
somewhere, but I couldn't be too upset with a
tie for first.
Other games from this period saw
me playing in the same manner-sharp, interesting
tactics with little need for positional niceties.
Silman-C Escondrillas
Mexico City 1975
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3
Nc6 3.Bb5 (I absolutely
loved playing the White side of the Ruy Lopez,
and I would have stuck with 1.e4 for life if
it wasn't for annoying openings like the Sicilian
and the French.) 3...a6
4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 0-0
9.h3 h6 10.d4 Re8 11.Nbd2 Bf8 12.Nf1 Bd7 13.Ng3
Na5 14.Bc2 g6 15.b3 c5 16.Be3 Nc6 17.d5 Ne7 18.Qd2
Kh7 19.Bxc5 (This,
my first international event, featured players
from South America, Mexico, and Cuba. I was the
only U.S. representative [my participation was
arranged by Koltanowski]. I arrived sick as a
dog and played the first few games with a high
fever, mowing everyone down with unnerving ease.
Alone in first, I made the monumental mistake
of getting well. Finally feeling great, my play
collapsed and I finished in the middle of the
field. This sacrifice of a piece was made in
my fevered state. Two pawns and a powerful center
seemed like a great deal!) 19...dxc5
20.Nxe5 Kg8 21.c4 Bg7 22.f4 Nh7 23.Rad1 b4 24.Rf1
a5 25.Nf3 a4 26.e5 axb3 27.axb3 Ra2? (A
mistake that allows me to take over the game.) 28.e6!
Bxe6 (Black didn't
like the look of 28...Bc8 29.exf7+ Kxf7 30.Bxg6+
followed by 31.Qxa2) 29.dxe6
Qxd2 30.exf7+ Kxf7 31.Rxd2 Rea8 (I
played the technical phase that follows far from
perfectly, but it turned out to be good enough
to eventually reel in the full point.) 32.Rff2
Ra1+ 33.Kh2 Nf8 34.f5 gxf5 35.Nxf5 Nxf5 36.Bxf5
Bf6 37.Rd6 R8a6 38.Rd5 R6a5 39.g4 Kg7 40.Kg3
R1a3 41.Bc2 Ra1 42.h4 Be7 43.Ne5 R5a2 (sealed
move) 44.Rf7+
Kg8 45.Rxe7 Rxc2 46.Nf3 Rc3 47.g5 hxg5 48.Rg5+
Kh8 49.Re8 Rg1+ 50.Kf4 Rxg5 51.Nxg5 Kg8 52.h5
Rc1 53.Rc8 Rf1+ 54.Ke5 Kg7 55.Ne6+ Nxe6 56.Kxe6
Rf6+ 57.Ke5 Rh6 58.Rxc5 Rxh5+ 59.Kd6 Rh3 60.Rb5
Rxb3 61.c5 Kf6 62.c6 Rd3+ 63.Kc7,
1-0.
Again, at that time my ultimate
failure in Mexico was a mystery to me. Looking
back, though, my losses featured good positions
(achieved by sharp tactics) fouled up by horrible
technique.
The following game makes a nice
impression because it didn't call for any technique
at all. A little heavy-handed brute force was
all I needed to get the job done.
Silman-D Strauss
Phoenix 1975
1.e4 g6 2.d4
Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.h3 (This
was my favorite way of dealing with the Pirc.) 5...0-0
6.Be3 c6 7.a4 a5 8.Be2 Na6 (Black
thinks that he is gaining a nice square on b4
for his Knight, but this is more or less an illusion.
The reality is that the Black horse can be kicked
away by an eventual c2-c3, while the hole on
b6 can turn into a very real problem after the
Nf3-d2-c4 maneuver.) 9.0-0
Nb4 10.Qd2 Qc7 11.Rad1 Re8 12.Qc1! (I've
always had a penchant for backwards "creeping" moves.
I don't know where this habit came from, but
it's served me well over the years. The strange
looking 12.Qc1 prepares the aforementioned Nf3-d2-c4
maneuver.) 12...b6
13.Nd2 (Now both 14.Nc4
and 14.f4 are in the air.) 13...d5 (Keeping
the Knight off of c4, but allowing me to create
a very favorable kingside attacking structure.) 14.e5
Nd7 15.f4 f5 16.Nf3 Ba6 17.Bxa6 Nxa6 18.Qd2 e6
19.g4 Rec8 20.Rf2 Rab8 21.Rg2 (Black's
queenside counterplay is almost nonexistent while
White's kingside attack more or less plays itself.) 21...b5
22.gxf5 b4 23.Ne2 exf5 24.b3 Nf8 25.h4 h5 26.Kh2
Bh6 27.Rdg1 Kf7 28.Qd3 Rb6 29.Rxg6 (The
rest of the game is rated "R" for extreme
violence.) 29...Nxg6
30.Qxf5+ Kg8 31.Qxg6+ Bg7 32.f5 Rf8 33.f6 Rf7
34.Nf4 c5 35.Ng5 Rbxf6 36.exf6 Rxf6 37.Qe8+,
1-0.
Another example of a backwards
creeping move: Silman-Montchalin, Richland 1985.

White to move and "creep."
1.Nb1! (The
Knight makes room for the Queen to come to
c3, while the Knight threatens to make its
way to c4 by Na3 or Nd2. The targets are the
Black pawns on b6, c5, and e5.) 1...Qf6
2.Qc3 Nd6 3.Nd2 e6 19.Bf1 Re8 20.a5 and
Black's position was falling apart (though
I later blundered and allowed my opponent to
make a draw).
<-
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
->
|