In
the first of our instructive lessons for beginners,
I stated that all the opening knowledge, strategy,
and endgame skill in the world is useless if you
let your opponents eat your pieces for free. Allow
me to repeat a key paragraph from the previous
lesson: If you are afflicted with this
piece blunder disease, you should
ignore the siren call of your chess library until
you find a cure. Fortunately, the cure is rather
straightforward: play as many games as possible,
but use each and every one as an exercise that
will help you root out the hopeless habit of dropping
your men. To accomplish this, you must understand
the following bit of truth: Every undefended piece
that stands on the fourth rank or further is at
risk (pieces on the first, second, and third ranks
must still be watched over, but they tend to be
automatically guarded since they are so close
to their own army)! Make sure these wandering
pieces are protected or, at the very least, be
aware of their plight and make sure nothing can
swallow them up. Conversely, the undefended pieces
of your opponent are like targets in a shooting
gallery. Be on the lookout for the opportunities
that your opponents will surely give you! As a chess beginner (and we all
were at one point or another!), you should concentrate
on fully absorbing three bits of advice: EVERY UNDEFENDED PIECE THAT STANDS
ON THE FOURTH RANK OR FURTHER IS AT RISK! MOST OF YOUR OPPONENTS WILL GIVE
YOU OPPORTUNITIES TO DEVOUR THEIR PIECES FOR FREE.
TRAIN YOUR EYE TO ALWAYS BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR
THESE “GIFTS.” ALMOST ALL TACTICAL OPERATIONS (even
very short ones) ARE BASED ON SOME FORM OF DOUBLE
ATTACK. This concept is a bit advanced, but we’ll
introduce it to you here and return to it many
times in the future. The following tests will show you
whether you have absorbed the simple but oh-so-important
lesson of “pieces in danger!” Problem #1: Black to play.
Can he safely capture White’s e4-pawn for
free by 1…Nxe4? The extremely tempting 1…Nxe4??
falls victim to an old but effective trap 2.Qa4+
(a powerful double attack against the Black King
and the undefended Knight on e4) 2…Nc6
3.Qxe4, and White is
up a piece for a pawn. Problem #2: Black to play.
White’s undefended d4-pawn seems ripe for
the taking via 1…Qxd4.
Would you take this pawn?  The pawn is poison because
Black is placing his Queen on an unprotected advanced
square (This isn’t always bad, but it should
ALWAYS cause you concern!). After 1…Qxd4??,
White wins by 2.Bb5+
(Attacking Black’s Queen with his own. The
check prevents Black from getting his Queen to
safety.) 2…Nc6
3.Bxc6+ (of course,
3.Qxd4 is also good since the c6-Knight is pinned
and can’t recapture the Queen) 3…bxc6
4.Qxd4 and White has
won the enemy Queen. Problem #3: White to play.
Attacking Black’s Knight by 1.e5
is very tempting. Should White try this advance?  If you liked 1.e5,
you forgot our rule that all pieces and pawns
on the fourth rank or beyond are potentially vulnerable.
In this case, 1.e5??
allows Black to win a pawn for nothing by 1…Nxe5. Problem #4: White to play.
If you were given the choice between the following
four moves (1.Nc3,
1.Bb5+, 1.h3, 1.Qxd6),
which would you choose?  To many players, 1.h3
looks desirable since it apparently prevents nasty
looking Black possibilities like …Bg4 or
…Ng4. Unfortunately, if you chose this move
you have succumbed to several misconceptions.
First, White should be developing his pieces as
quickly as possible, not defensively pushing pawns
due to irrational fears (in chess, fears based
on emotion rather than fact are called “ghosts”).
Second, …Bg4 or …Ng4
would still be possible since a White capture
on g4 (via hxg4) would lose the undefended Rook
via …Qxh1. Thus, your “defensive”
move really achieved nothing at all! Third, you have completely
forgotten about your undefended e-pawn! After
1.h3, Black would hack off your key central bit
by 1…Nxe4. Having relegated 1.h3 to
the rubbish heap, let’s take a look at the
greedy 1.Qxd6.
I’m all for greed, and want you to boldly
take his stuff if he’s kind enough to hand
it to you. However, here you have forgotten that
1.Qxd6??
loses right away to 1…Bxd6.
Yes--the d6-pawn was defended after all! Many of you might have picked
1.Bb5+
as White’s most logical choice. It develops,
checks the Black King, and prepares to castle.
Unfortunately, you have placed your Bishop on
an undefended square (okay in itself, but always
be aware of the unprotected nature of your pieces!)
and completely blanked out the fact that Black’s
Queen is just a jump away from b5! Thus, 1.Bb5+
fails badly to 1…Qxb5. This leaves us with the correct
1.Nc3.
This simple developing move defends e4 (a very
important point!), and also eyes the advanced
squares on b5 and d5. Play might continue 1…Be7
2.Be2 when White’s
forces are coming out nicely, all his developed
pieces and pawns are protected, and Black’s
Queen isn’t comfortable facing off with
against the e2-Bishop (Note that after 2.Be2,
Black can’t try to pawn hungry 2…Qg6??
since 3.Nh4 wins copious amounts of material). Problem #5: White to play.
Can White safely eat the unprotected pawn on e5?  Black has failed to defend
his pawn and White SHOULD punish him by 1.Nxe5.
True, the Knight is undefended on this square,
so a careful look is necessary before chopping
off the enemy e-pawn. However, in this case all
is well and White can safely absorb his meal and
then get his Knight to safety by 2.d4 (defending
the horse) or 2.Nf3 (the hero returns home!).
|