Everybody likes to attack in chess – it's fun
and exciting. From my experience, that can
often be used against an opponent. Many players
will continue to attack even when they would
be better off thinking about more peaceful methods.
In particular, a rook lift to the kingside is
a dangerous attacking plan that also burns some
bridges. After all, if the kingside attack does
not succeed, the rook is simply out of play.
There are many examples of the defending side
launching a strong counterattack or transposing
into a good ending based on the poor placement
of an "attacking" rook out of play
for other operations.
The following game made a great impression on
me when I first encountered it.
E. Geller vs. M. Euwe
1953 Zurich
Candidates Tournament
Nimzo-Indian Defense,
Delayed Saemisch Variation
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4
4.e3 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 8.f3 Nc6
9.Ne2 0-0 10.0-0 Na5 11.e4 Ne8
This is a key move in black's defensive scheme.
If white is allowed to play Bg5, the pin would
be extremely uncomfortable. The knight retreat
also allows black to play ...f6 if necessary
to block the advance of the f-pawn and give the
black king an escape square.
12.Ng3 cxd4 13.cxd4 Rc8 14.f4 Nxc4
It is common in this line for white to sacrifice
his weak c4-pawn for kingside attacking chances.
It is clear that white will now aim at the kingside,
and black will bank upon his extra pawn and play
on the queenside.
15.f5 f6 16.Rf4 b5!
Black starts a counterattack involving his queenside
forces. Other than the presence of white's d-pawn,
the position could conceivably arise from a Sicilian
Defense.
17.Rh4 Qb6 18.e5 Nxe5 19.fxe6
Nxd3 20.Qxd3 Qxe6 21.Qxh7+ Kf7 22.Bh6 Rh8!!

This is the culmination of black's play, sacrificing
a rook to decoy the queen from control
of the c2-square.
23.Qxh8 Rc2 24.Rc1 Rxg2+ 25.Kf1 Qb3 26.Ke1
Qf3, 0-1.
This game deservedly won a brilliancy prize
in a tournament filled with worthy games.
The following game, while not nearly as spectacular,
is based on a similar idea: at the key moment,
black lures white forward so that he may counterattack.
David Kerkove (2130) vs. Randy Bauer (2275)
1996
South Dakota Governor's Cup
Sicilian Defense
1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Bc4
e6
Black's set-up has taken a lot of the fun out
of this variation for white. The problem is that
5.Bb5 Nd4! cuts across the white plan to play
against doubled c-pawns, while now black is readying
...d5.
6.0-0
The most thematic try, 6.f5, runs into 6...Nge7!
7.fxe6 when black has good chances after 7...dxc6
(solid) or 7...fxe6 (enterprising). I've preferred
7...dxc6 8.d3 0-0 9.0-0 Na5 10.Qe1 Nec6! 11.Bg5
f6 12.Be3 b6 with good play for black (Mandeville-Bauer,
Iowa 1991 and Kosanovic-Damljanovic, Belgrade
1993).
6...Nge7 7.d3 d5 8.Bb3 0-0
9.f5!?

This is a typical method for white in this line
(see above). From my database, however, the only
move in master play from this position is 9.Qe1.
Then black has a variety of playable moves, with
9...Nd4 the most popular. I would probably prefer
9...Na5.
9...dxe4 10.f6
The only consistent response. 10.Nxe4 Nxf5 11.Nxc5??
Bd4+ wins a piece, and 10.dxe4 Qxd1 11.Rxd1 exf5
12.exf5 Bxf5 is clearly good for black.
10...Bxf6 11.Ne4 Bg7 12.Kh1
Again, 12.Nxc5?? loses to 12...Bd4+.
12...Na5
This is a practical choice from black, but 12...b6
is more principled. I decided that I didn't want
to let white keep his light squared bishop (as
with 13.a3).
Removing the white light-squared bishop is a
key part of black's planned method of defense.
A good way to deal with white's threats in this
type of position is with the pawn formation ...f6
and ...e5. This keeps white's knights out of
the dangerous g5 and f6 squares and allows black's
light-squared bishop freedom on either the h1-a8
or h3-c8 diagonals. Of course, this would be
too dangerous if white's light squared bishop
was bearing down on the a2-g8 diagonal.
13.Qe1
Kerkove and I have played a similar position
before, and I was pretty sure that he'd continue
his pawn sacrifice. Still, 13.Nxc5 is probably
best. After 13...Nxb3 14.axb3 b6 15.Ne4 Bb7 black
has the two bishops but white has some attacking
chances. I'd still rate it slightly better for
black.
13...Nxb3 14.axb3 b6 15.Bd2 Nf5
I didn't seriously consider 15...Bxb2, since
16.Qh4 Nf5 17.Qh3 allows white's queen to get
to the kingside. Even here black probably has
a defensible position, but I saw no need, being
a pawn up, to let things get potentially out
of hand.
16.Bc3 Bxc3
16...Nd4 17.Nxd4 cxd4 18.Bb4 Re8 19.Nd6 is not
what black has in mind. Black doesn't really
mind the exchange of bishops. From above we've
seen that the black defensive formation with
pawns on f6 and e5 is effective in defending
against a kingside attack. This is the primary
reason that black goes to great lengths to eliminate
the light squared bishop – the f6/e5 pawn structure
would be too dangerous if white had his light
squared bishop.
17.bxc3 Bb7 18.Qf2 Nd6 19.Nxd6
19.Neg5 Bxf3 20.Nxf3 f6 followed by ...e5 gives
a similar black position without black keeping
the strong bishop. The downside is that 19.Neg5
h6 20.Nh3 e5! leaves the knight misplaced on
h3.
19...Qxd6 20.Ng5 f6 21.Nf3 e5 22.Qe3 a5!

If we assess the position in terms of imbalances,
white can attempt to attack on the kingside.
Black has an extra pawn and the chance to create
a passed pawn with ...a5...b5...a4. Black starts
that plan, and he goads white into moving his
pieces to the kingside. Why? Because it will
make it harder for white to stop the passed a-pawn.
23.Ra4
This is white's last chance to easily get this
piece to the kingside, since otherwise black
could play ...b5. Whether white should actually
do this is another question, but I was certain
that white would make this move.
23...b5! 24.Rh4 a4! 25.bxa4 bxa4
Of course not 25...Rxa4? 26.Rh3 when there is
no passed a-pawn.
26.Qh6 Qe7 27.Ra1 Bc6 28.Nd2 Rfb8 29.Ne4
Rb7
Black makes a patient move. He first protects
his kingside, then he can push his a-pawn.
30.c4
If white is going to hold, he needs to get his
heavy pieces on the h-file back into play. Unfortunately
for him, it may already be too late. After 30.Qe3
f5! 31.Ng5?? f4 wins. The best try would be 31.Qxc5,
but 31...Bxe4! 32.Qxe7 Rxe7 33.dxe4 f4! 34.Rh3
Rc7! 35.Rd3 Rc4 is a won ending.
30...f5 31.Nc3 f4!

Black has hit upon a winning plan: white's heavy
pieces on the h-file are basically out of play
for the rest of the game. Compare Euwe-Geller's
method for isolating white's pieces.
32.Rg4 Qe6 33.h3 Rb2 34.Nd5 Ra7
Defends from afar, although 34...Bxd5 is also
good enough.
35.Re1
Threatening 36.Rxf4! or 36.Nxf4!
35...Bxd5 36.cxd5 Qf6
36...Qxd5 is also good enough, but it requires
more calculating because of white's ideas of
sacrificing a rook on g6.
37.h4 a3 38.h5 Rg7 39.Ra1 a2 40.Kh2 Rxc2
41.hxg6 Rxg6 42.Rxg6+ hxg6 43.Qh3 f3! 44.Qc8+
Kg7, 0-1.
45.Qc7+ Kh6 and there are no more checks; 45.Qd7+
Qf7 46.Qxf7+ Kxf7, and after an eventual ...fxg2,
one of the black pawns on the seventh will queen.